Motherhood and The Holocaust

Written by Georgia WILLIAMS - MA in War Studies

Edited by Isabelle GUERRERO - BA in International Relations

Born in Poland in 1937, Hannah Lewis was only 6 years old when herself and her mother were transported to Adampol forced labour camp. Hannah’s long-standing advocacy for Holocaust awareness and education, through the presentation of her experiences, earned her an MBE in 2017. As part of Holocaust Memorial Day, which this year centres around the theme of the Fragility of Freedom, King’s College London hosted Hannah Lewis MBE which allowed students to hear her story.

It begins with her grandfather, who moved to Włodawa, Poland from Ukraine where he met her grandmother. They had three children, including her father, Adam. Hannah’s father helped with the family business, which required him to travel around Poland and to Germany, and he became more aware and afraid of the rise of Hitler and Nazism. Unbeknownst to Hannah and her family, Sobibor extermination camp was constructed, with the purpose of exterminating and persecuting minorities that did not align with Nazi ideology. Jewish families from more populated towns moved to Włodawa in hopes of escaping capture by the Nazis, bringing stories of disappearances. When German soldiers entered her town, Hannah’s father approached a village elder to ask for assistance and protection. The elder, who owned a farm in Adampol, promised that he would look out for Hannah and her mother, Haya, if they were to be taken away. In 1943, after returning from a night of hiding in the loft of a nearby barn, Hannah and Haya were forcibly marched to Adampol; a forced labour camp within Sobibor. They were separated from Adam, who had escaped whilst being transported. The village elder, keeping his promise to Hannah’s father, insisted that Hannah and Haya, along with Hannah’s cousin, Shlomo, would work on his farm and return to their barracks at night.

In the winter of 1944, Hannah became extremely sick with a temperature and suspected typhoid. Her mother appealed for permission to stay in the kitchen of the farmhouse for one night, rather than the freezing barracks in the camp. Permission was granted, and Haya created a bed to shield Hannah from the cold and huddled for warmth. At some point during the night, Haya was awoken by a tapping on the window. She cautiously opened it, revealing that Adam had walked to Adampol to rescue them. He had been told that there was a German raid occurring the next morning, which would likely result in the death of Hannah and Haya if they did not leave. Adam insisted he would carry his sick child, but Haya knew that if they left, Hannah would succumb to her sickness. Haya refused to leave, stating that she would stay with Hannah to protect her. Adam left, without his wife and daughter. The next morning, Hannah and her mother were awoken again by loud bangs on the kitchen door. Haya rose, kissed and hugged her daughter, told her to stay where she was, and left. Some shouting and noise followed, prompting Hannah to look for her mother. Haya was ushered in front of a well, with some other prisoners. The Nazis then proceeded to shoot them. Hannah watched in shock, not making a noise, stating that ‘I can’t tell you how long I stood there, but it was a long while’. 7-year-old Hannah returned to bed in the kitchen and was awoken sometime later by the elder’s niece giving her milk to drink.

Throughout her testimony, Hannah repeatedly emphasises the importance of the relationship with her mother. Her mother was her protector, carer and comforter, which is epitomised by the sacrifice of her own life for her daughter’s. The narrative of motherhood during the Holocaust is centred on the notion of sacrifice. Jewish women, who had children, were systematically and strategically targeted by the Nazi regime due to their ability to produce Jewish children, which directly opposed the pure German Aryan race. From the perspective of the Jewish parent, having their family with them (in concentration camps or ghettos) was seen as a blessing and a burden, pushing the boundaries of their parental responsibilities and having much more to lose. The position of the mother, however, has been missing from academic debates and narratives of the Holocaust. The common belief among academics, specifically historians, was that female and male experiences of the Holocaust were the same. However, as Hannah’s testimony emphasises, Jewish women’s socially constructed roles as mothers and carers often drastically reduced their chances of survival. Today, second-wave feminism, along with awareness and academic interest into female perspectives of genocide, women’s experiences are beginning to come to light.

During the liberation, Hannah reunited with her father, then moved around Poland until she was taken to London. She settled, married and had children, but never forgot her mother: ‘I never stopped missing her. Never. I never will’.



Further Reading:

Baumel, Judith Tydor. “‘Rachel Laments Her Children’—Representation of Women in Israeli Holocaust Memorials.” Israel Studies 1, no. 1 (1996): 100–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30245475.

Clementi, Federica K. Holocaust Mothers and Daughters. Family, History and Trauma. Brandeis University Press, 2013.

Duffy, Helena. “Motherhood during and after the Holocaust: Testimonial and Fictional Perspectives.” The Journal of Holocaust Research 34, no. 2 (April 2, 2020): 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856.

Feinstein, Margarete Myers. “Absent Fathers, Present Mothers: Images of Parenthood in Holocaust Survivor Narratives.” Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies & Gender Issues, no. 13 (2007): 155–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/nas.2007.-.13.155.

Gapsch, Andrea. “A Feminist Historiography of Jewish Motherhood during the Holocaust .” The Macksey Journal 1, no. 23 (2020): 1–17.

Gerber, Nancy. “My Mother’s Face: Remembering Mothers in the Holocaust Testimony of Francine Christophe and Cordelia Edvardson.” Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering 10, no. 2 (2008): 158–68.

Hertzog, Esther. “Subjugated Motherhood and the Holocaust.” Dapim: Studies on the Holocaust 30, no. 1 (January 2, 2016): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23256249.2016.1126983.

Kaplan, Marion. “Did Gender Matter during the Holocaust?” Jewish Social Studies 24, no. 2 (2019): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2979/jewisocistud.24.2.05.

Ofer, Dalia. “Parenthood in the Shadow of the Holocaust.” In Jewish Families in Europe, 1939-Present: History, Representation, and Memory, edited by Joanna Beata Michlic, 3–25. Brandeis University Press, 2017.

Ringelheim, Joan. “Women and the Holocaust: A Reconsideration of Research.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 10, no. 4 (July 1985): 741–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/494181.

Women in the War in Ukraine

Written by Andrea York TUER - MA Intelligence and International Security

Edited by Isabelle GUERRERO - BA International Relations

Within the domain of War Studies, the intricate and often overlooked experiences of women during conflicts command heightened attention, given their substantial implications for both societal structures and individual well-being. In pursuit of a deeper understanding of this vital topic, the Women in War and International Politics (WIWIP) and Women in International Security (WIIS) councils convened their inaugural symposium for the academic year 2023/24 at King's College London. This symposium served as a platform for esteemed scholars to explore the nuanced realities surrounding the role of women in the War in Ukraine.

Dr. Andrea Ellner, a Lecturer in Defense Studies at KCL, Oskana Potapova, a Ph.D. student in the Department of Gender Studies at LSE, and Tetyana Nikita, Senior Research Manager at BBC Media Action, actively participated in a thought-provoking discussion about the multifaceted role of women in Ukraine. This engaging dialogue was skillfully moderated by Daryana Dvornichenko, a research fellow at the University of Oxford.

The panel delved into a spectrum of issues, ranging from the everyday challenges faced by women in the conflict to the influence of media on shaping gender constructs. It scrutinized the varied arenas where women actively engage and bear the impact within the context of the war in Ukraine. Amidst the prevalent narratives dominated by terms such as counteroffensive, execution, Zelensky, Putin, frontlines, attack, strike, drone, exclusive footage, escalation, and tanks, the panel underscored the often-overlooked narrative of women in Ukraine. In a media landscape saturated with sensationalism, the discussion shed light on the vital role of women in both academic discourse and media narratives. The panel served as a reminder that while geopolitical terms and military actions dominate headlines, the experiences and contributions of women are equally indispensable components of the multifaceted reality of war.

Tetyana Nikita's perspective on women in Ukraine was particularly noteworthy, highlighting three essential groups. Firstly, women who have not changed their place of living: this is the largest group and revolves around employment, mental health, safety, and security. The second group is composed of internally displaced women: this group faces challenges related to employment, health, and the impact of war. Reintegration into communities and finding employment are crucial factors for their self-resilience and mental health. Thirdly, women living in non-government-controlled areas: this group faces limited access to communication, the internet, and security, switching on survival mode with no energy to volunteer like the first cluster of women. Central to the discussions across these three distinct groups was the pervasive issue of gender roles. The examination of stereotypical masculinity, the endeavor to forge a feminist future, and the analysis of power dynamics became prominent themes. A notable shift in traditional roles emerged during the war in Ukraine, with women not only seeking weapons, materials for survival, and medical care but also challenging the assumption that they are inherently inclined toward peace-making, as emphasized by Dr. Ellner.

These separate life experiences embody the complexity of life in wartime Ukraine. The challenges of double displacement further worsen the situation, with solutions highlighting the impact of conflict and economic factors. The political context adds varying narratives to understanding the conflict's nature, making it challenging to grasp the notion of security within communities. Issues such as negotiating relationships, finding employment, addressing transferable skills, shifting gender roles within families, and addressing pre-existing problems (e.g. insufficient spaces in kindergartens) are all part of the multi-faced picture.

Finally, the panel discussed the role of media and communications in the perpetuation of gender roles and inequalities. All speakers agreed there was a need for greater feminist perspectives in media, as we see narratives sexualizing female fighters and demonizing women who decide to put their parental duties on hold to fight for their country are pushed daily. A second issue concerning communication was mentioned by Oskana Potapova, who drew attention to the instrumentalization of Ukrainian migrant women, in European right-wing groups. Delving into issues of migration and media representation finally allowed the panel to remind us of the power of gender analysis in the comprehension of contemporary issues of international relations, politics, and security.

In summary, the Women in the Ukrainian War symposium has been a crucial illumination of the universal experiences of women in conflict. From the stark realities faced by women in the military to the redefinition of gender roles within the private sphere, a notable shift in traditional gender norms is evident within the backdrop of war-torn societies. The call to extend our discussions and research into the nuanced gender realities and amplify the voices of the "invisible women" navigating conflict is a resonant message from the scholars.

By broadening our understanding and knowledge base on the diverse experiences within conflict, we are prompted to contribute to a more comprehensive approach. This approach, in turn, is poised to inform policies that not only empower Ukrainian women amidst the conflict but also catalyze the broader reconstruction of their country and culture. The symposium, therefore, served as a catalyst for forging a path towards inclusive and impactful initiatives that extend far beyond the academic realm.